Friday, 13 January 2012

Apocalypse Now



Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, Apocalypse Now ranks as one of the highest Vietnam War movies. At the peak of the Vietnam War, skilled soldier Captain Benjamin Willard is extracted from a drunken, troubled state to accept his most intrepid and secretive mission thus far. Having completed one tour of duty in Vietnam, he returns home only to find himself miserable amid the confines of civilization. Military officials thrust him into the heart of chaos and destruction, otherwise known as Cambodia, to locate and exterminate the deranged psychotic Colonel Kutz. As they surpass safety and progress up the Nung River, Willard confronts not only the same terrors that ultimately lead Kurtz to insanity, but the primitive barbarianism instinctual of human nature.
Oddly enough, it appears Willard is most sane in the confines of war rather than the quite ambience of a hotel room. The loud, dangerous, environment of a battlefield grows to become a comfortable home for Willard, as his mind is most at ease when in control of the chaos. He cannot stand stillness, yet yearns for the turmoil of Vietnam. Ironically, Willard’s mission includes executing an ex-commander who has become mentally unsound, while it is evident Willard mirrors a similar state and is equally unstable.
For various reasons, it is clear Apocalypse Now is an anti-war movie and discourages war. Each perspective you look at or character you decipher proves the theory that war benefits no one but the government and leaves nothing but a trail of damage. Not only are soldiers forced to endure challenging circumstances while on the battlefield such as lack of food, sleep, and shelter, but the memories and images etched in their minds will haunt them forever. Apocalypse Now focuses predominantly on the effects war has on soldiers and depicts the insanity that takes over their mind when surrounded by such a difficult atmosphere. By examining the various characters involved we can see the psychological effect it has on their mind. Chef, having been enlisted at a young age, depicts the waste of an education that is thrown away when soldiers are sent off to war and the permanency of the pain it leaves them in. Kurtz symbolizes the outcome of human immorality. The injustice we impose, the horrors we inflict, and the harm that we cause, are all valid reasons as to why Kurtz lost faith in the human race. Numerous times we witness innocent lives being wrongfully taken, not only Vietnamese souls but American ones as well. When we cause such atrocities as the Vietnam War, how can we be looked at as an empathetic species? If we have no mercy we deserve no compassion, a likely motto that Kurtz adopted as his own.
Despite Coppola’s uncertainty of who to cast as Captain Willard, Martin Sheen remains the obvious choice demonstrating exceptional acting abilities surpassing all expectations. Coppola primarily envisioned Steve McQueen as Willard, yet he refused to spend 17 weeks overseas away from America and therefore decline the position. Second in request was Al Pacino, who then provided the same excuse as well as a fear of falling ill in the jungle and rejected the role as well. Upon finally finding someone who agreed to the terms, Coppola hired Harvey Keitel to take on the job. A week into filming in the Philippines Coppola regretted his decision and replaced Keitel with Sheen. Despite the hard effort of finding a suitable role, Coppola ultimately succeeded in recruiting the perfect actor.  
  War has been a part of humanity since the beginning of time, etched in one’s genes. This movie illustrates the power the military has over its army followers and the lack of freedom to move, think, and act one has once enlisted. Overall, Apocalypse Now harshly depicts the difficult circumstances a war entails and the long term effects it has on its victims.

The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight exceeds all other criminal movies without a doubt, bringing both originality and suspense to the screen.  Taking place a mere year after being introduced to Bruce Wayne’s alter-ego, Batman, Gotham is at his feet once again begging for his help. As the rise of the twisted criminal mastermind, known only as the Joker, thrusts the nation into anarchy Batman is forced to face his most personal and gruesome task yet. 
Along with creating a brilliant plotline and well executed cinematography, director Christopher Nolan could not have done a better job casting wise. Christian Bale (playing Batman) and Heath Ledger (playing the Joker) mastered their characters perfectly without a hint of flaw. Bale’s permanently straight, serious, posture suggests his high level of class and sophistication and seems to bore right into your soul. Though unknown to characters within the movie, the relation between Batman and Bruce Wayne is clear when examining their mannerisms. Bale plays both with a rough, firm facial demeanour that can’t be replaced by anyone. In addition to adding a mysterious aroma to Bruce Wayne’s character, Bale performed an impressive amount of Batman’s stunts on his own.  
Supporting role actor Heath Ledger had to compete with renowned actors such as Robin Williams and Steve Carell for the park of Joker, yet Ledger’s chaotic interpretation of the role won Nolan over. Ledger’s dedication and devotion to the film is evident in each scene he plays, in each lick of the lips and brush of the hair. However, transforming into a mass murdering, terror causing citizen, does not happen overnight. In preparation for the film, Ledger locked himself in a hotel room, utterly alone and isolated from civilization.  In a month’s duration, through documenting the Joker’s thoughts and feelings in a diary, Ledger managed to master a whole new persona.
In truth, the issues represented in this film create a somewhat paradoxical effect. Trouble arises when criminals deny the law and take matters into their own hands, believing they can be excused from the law. These murderous criminals are the enemies, our foes. But what really makes them so different from Batman himself? Though we see him as a protector, he rebels against the government at the same extent as they do, sentencing individuals to their death without a fair trial. Batman damages, destroys, and annihilates the city, all while refusing to reveal his identity. Other than the amount in which they’ve killed, there is no real difference between Joker and Batman, our enemy and our protector. This proves there is no black and white to good and evil, simply a greyscale of neutral. Nothing bad is ever all wicked, and every good has a tint of mischief. The Joker displays moments of consideration when he refuses to kill Batman, and Batman breaks his “one rule” by killing Harvey Dent.
Though the Joker and Batman achieve similar acts, the methods in which they execute them vary drastically. One aspect that aids in differentiating the two is the use of makeup and costume. Both fall under the stereotypical look given to them, Batman sporting his signature cape and mask and the Joker with a dyed green wig and red lips. Giving them the look we anticipate allows the audience to apply any previous background information to help locate the character and understand their behaviour. This also may bring a form of nostalgia to those who grew up with the infamous Batman series comic books. In these stereotypes, Batman wraps himself in monochromatic attire consisting of simply the colour black as a method to blend into the knight and intimidate criminals.  Joker on the other hand, relies on bright colours such as green, purple, and yellow, to mark his presence and prove his daring and fearless personality. Their contrasting methods strengthens the idea that Batman acts only when needed and prefers to remain unnoticed, whereas the Joker goes out of his way be seen, make noise, and create chaos.
Christopher Nolan has changed the face of Batman forever, it is no longer merely a comic book, yet a story brought to life. It no longer involves two-dimensional characters, yet real life villains that can be traced back to society. It displays the capacities of the human mind, and darkness of the human heart. It illustrates the destruction our world will succumb to if individuals worldwide lack empathy and compassion for one another. A success in every manner, The Dark Knight will not disappoint.

Monday, 9 January 2012

From Hell

So far I have enjoyed just about every film that we have watched as a class but From Hell directed by Albert Hughes seems to break that chain. I did not like the constant melancholy mood that was engraved into the film nor the dark lurking feeling it associated with London. Set in 1888, a ruthless murder seeks out prostitutes in East London. What differentiates this serial killer from all others is his sick methods of removing the females’ genitals suggesting he obtains an extensive medical background.
 I thought it extremely unbelievable and predictable.  The fact that the investigator fell in love with a whore could be predicted from the very beginning and failed to create a romantic twist. In addition, having Sir William Gull (played by Ian Holm) as Jack the Ripper is a poor choice considering it was evident all along that it would be him. There was no surprise to the accusation and considering the case was never solved it lead me to believe the movie was unrealistic and failed at creating a mystery. I do have to admit though that the producer chose an excellent cast with superb acting abilities. Johnny Depp could not have pretended to be a better meth addict and frankly, he was one of the only reasons I would buy into the film. In addition, i do feel as if I gained a fair amount of knowledge about Jack the Ripper by viewing this film. I was never too aware of this case or its extremity and it did effectively portray the vile, sick mind of Jack the Ripper.
Personally I would not recommend this film to others, the largest benefit this film has and the reason why it kept me intrigued is solely because it is based on a true-life horror story. 

Born on the Fourth of July

Based on the inspirational story of Ron Kovic, Born on The Fourth of July depicts the brutal reality of mistreatment of soldiers.  Growing up with the dream of becoming a US marine, Ron’s desire finally comes true when he leaves his education behind and heads to Vietnam. Kovic receives a huge reality shock when the havoc and confusion of war lead him to accidentally kill a fellow marine, an unforgettable event that haunts his soul forever. Overwhelmed by guilt and disoriented by the chaos, Kovic finds himself vulnerable to his surroundings and is shot leaving him paralyzed from the chest down. 
 As awful as the warzone in Vietnam was, it did not even begin to compare with the environment in the veterans hospital. Here, Ron feels dreadfully neglected and underappreciated. This film portrays how hospitals failed to regard their victims on a humane level and the lack of respect they obtained for them. Ironically, it is when Kovic finally reaches the confines of safety that he feels most fragile and abused. Throughout the film, the series of unfortunate events that follow Kovic are eventually what lead him to become an anti-war activist and participate in anti-war rallies.
A large theme prominent in this film shows how the government wrongfully glorifies the military in attempt to fool the naive. The various forms of propaganda, such as bringing in marine speakers to brainwash the young, provide a false perception of war and gives the idea that it is ones duty to serve in the army. Children worldwide were tricked into believing they will find pride and fame in Vietnam, when in reality all they found was trouble and horror.
Physical appearance is an extremely effective element in this film as it portrays the downfall of Ron. During his high school years, the combination of Ron’s short haircut and clean, well-dressed attire represent his sanity and innocence. As he matures and is influenced by war, he starts to let go of his appearance and begin to look as troubled as he feels. This is most predominantly visible through Ron’s growing hair that eventually becomes uncared for and untamed.
Overall, this is a great movie bursting with emotional appeal and realism. The large amount of blood and gore aids in providing a realistic vibe, while Ron’s unfortunate luck attracts sympathy and remorse from the audience. All in all Born on the Fourth of July is a must see, capturing Tom Cruise at his peak.